The Allegory Of The Cave By Plato And Rene Descartes

What is Philosophy? Well, by conventional definition, Philosophy is the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct. This, while providing a contextual definition of the word philosophy, just scratches the surface of its actual meaning. In this essay we will attempt to answer â€Å"What is Philosophy?† by discussing the works of Plato and Rene Descartes. First, we begin by summarizing and comparing the theme of their works for similarities so as to better form a definition. In order to begin answering the question, â€Å"What is Philosophy?† we must comprehend each author’s method, themes, and goals throughout their works. Plato, being a Socratic apprentice, followed and transcribed the experiences Socrates had in his teachings and search of understanding. In Plato’s first work, The Allegory of the Cave, Socrates forms the understanding between appearance vs. reality and the deceptions we are subject to by the use o f forms. In the cave, the prisoners’ experiences are limited to what their senses can tell them, the shadows on the walls, and their shackles; these appearances are all that they have to form their ideas. When one of the prisoners begins to question his reality he makes his way out of the cave and into the day light. This prisoners understanding of his reality has now expanded, thus the theory of forms; when he returns to the cave to spread the news, the others do not believe him. They have been deceived by their reality and whatShow MoreRelatedA Comparison Of Rene Descartes And The Matrix754 Words   |  4 Pagesto enlightenment that exist between the movie The Matrix, the excerpt from Allegory of the Cave by Plato and Meditation I of the Things of Which We May Doubt by Rene Descartes, there is a subtle difference in regards to being informed by others or seeking answers constantly yourself about what is real. The possibility for someone else controlling human reality has been around since 380 BC based on Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Socrates and Glaucon are conversing about the prisoners who are restrainedRead MoreAngelabrafford-Phil Essay830 Words   |  4 Pages Great philosophers such as Plato, Socrates and Descartes developed theories thousands of years ago which changed the thought processes of many. These theories today are still influencing the lives of others. The Matrix, a very well-known movie released in 1999, retelling Plato’s theory, questioned the existence of reality and /or what we perceive as reality. The Matrix, Plato’s ‘Allegory of the Cave’ and Descartes ‘Meditation I’, all have similar views on reality, illusionRead MoreComparing Plato And Descartes The Matrix, The Allegory Of The Cave889 Words   |  4 PagesThe short stories, written by both authors Plato and Descartes; The Matrix, The Al legory of the Cave, and Meditations on First Philosophy, focuses on what individuals believe to be reality or not within the world. The stories bring on questions of what is in fact illusion. Overall, the stories provide a guide to the truth. According to Wachowski, A, Wachowski, L (1999) in the Matrix, Mr. Anderson questions everything in the world as he knows it. He wonders if what he is involved in a computer programRead MorePlato, Descartes, and the Matrix Essay654 Words   |  3 PagesPlato, Descartes, and The Matrix Kyra Eigenberger Liberty University Deception is the foundational issue prevalent in The Matrix, Plato’s allegory of the cave, and Rene Descartes meditations. In each of these excerpts the goal of answering the question of what is real and how to uncover the truth is essential. Another question that arises throughout all three excerpts is whether or not the individuals will be able to handle the truth when it is finally learnt. In The Matrix Morpheus revealsRead MoreThe Views On The Senses, But At The Same Time1368 Words   |  6 PagesGeathers Philosophy S. Yeng 10/2/15 The topic of paper will involve an in-depth discussion of two differing views on the senses, but at the same time. These two epistemological and ontological views have been discussed by French philosopher Rene Descartes and Greek philosopher, Socrates. The first view, where Socrates proposes that in understanding knowledge, the senses should not be of great importance to humanity. He instead believes that understanding the world of ideas is the theory that inRead MoreWhat do Plato, Descartes, and The Matrix all have in common? All of them study the possibility that600 Words   |  3 PagesWhat do Plato, Descartes, and The Matrix all have in common? All of them study the possibility that our world is just a fantasy. They also demand that we took a good look into the relationship concerning our senses and reality. There is one similarity between all three works that is clear: their writers are skeptical that the real world that surrounds could just be a product of our faulty senses. Can we really rely on them to justify whether or not what we are perceiving is real? â€Å"All that I haveRead MorePlato, Descartes, and the Matrix603 Words   |  3 PagesMatrix is based on the Brain in the Vat. The Matrix, Rene Descartes, Meditation I Of The Things Of Which We May Doubt and Plato’s, â€Å"The Allegory of the Cave,† all hold similarities to the Brain in the Vat; therefore they hold similarities to each other. Although they hold similarities to each other there are also some differences between these three reasons. The similarities between the movie The Matrix, Plato’s cave analogy and Descartes’ Meditation I are that they questioned what they knewRead MoreThe Matrix the Cave and Meditations Essay1829 Words   |  8 PagesThe Matrix, The Cave And Meditations PHIL 201 John L. Hill II Liberty University John Hill Professor Allyn Kyes Philosophy 201 October 18, 2012 The Matrix, The Cave And Meditations Thesis: There are many similarities in the Matrix ( Wachowski, Andy, and Lana Wachowski 1999 ), The Allegory of the Cave ( Plato ) and Meditation I of The Things of Which We May Doubt ( Decartes, 1641 ). It appears as you take a close look at the Matrix that it is a retelling of â€Å"TheRead MoreEmerson’s Unifying Philosophy Essay1143 Words   |  5 Pagesscholars have earnestly pursued knowledge and the attainment of truth. Historical figures such as Plato, Descartes, and Emerson sought answers to daunting questions of: ‘What is truth?’; ‘What is reality?’; ‘How is wisdom acquired?’ Many scholars believe these philosophers presented conflicting viewpoints: Plato encouraging skepticism among all previous historical, cultural, and personal perspectives; Descartes questioning definitions of reality and his very existence; Emerson encouraging self-trust andRead MoreFallibilism and the Justified Deduction Principle1337 Words   |  5 Pagessufficient ground for this. How can one state that justified true belief is knowledge? This problem was deeply examined by a German philosopher Edmund Gettier who explained the difference and provided significant evidence for questioning everything, as Descartes did. Explanations by Gettier are intricate and more related to the true or false correlation between something that a person believes to be the true and something that prevents him or her to think so. Edmund Gettier took the topic of justification

Minimum Wage And Magical Thinking Opinion - 1012 Words

Minimum Wage and Magical Thinking Opinion In the reading of Minimum wage and magical thinking he discusses that raising the minimum wage would have a negative impact and would actually hurt those that it is supposed to help and I would agree. Raising the minimum wage would cause inflation to rise, thus basically canceling out what it was intended to do and making the US dollar worth less. Secondly, minimum wage increase would cause the price of goods to rise and then less people will be buying so, then you are paying employees more and making less revenue. Lastly, this would hurt the very people that raising the minimum wage is intended to help because the number of jobs that are entry level or low skilled will drop and then people who were making a 7.25 minimum wage will now be earning a 0 dollar wage. Minimum wage does not need to increase, especially not as drastic as some people are calling for and the positive outcome that is thought it would produce actually would be doing more harm than good. If the minimum wage were to rise inflation in turn would rise too as Issac Newton’s third law says for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The general idea is to pay people more money, but not to increase the cost of goods which in a perfect world that may work, but this is the real world and that isn’t how it works. If for example, McDonalds starts paying their minimum wage employees 10.10 nationwide in turn what used to be a one dollar cheeseburgerShow MoreRelatedDynamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Apple, Inc.4865 Words   |  20 Pagesa definition for the corporate social responsibility concept. The author discuss a period which covers 50 years (Bakker et al. 2005). Some authors claim that companies’ interaction with society can be viewed through the creation of jobs, paying wages and taxes to the government (Smith 2003). In addition, other authors state that companies, besides their economic and legal obligations for their owners and governments, have to take more proactive actions regarding their corporate social performanceRead MoreHuman Resources Management150900 Words   |  604 Pagesgoods to other countries. This is particularly true with more highly skilled, technical jobs in technology-driven industries. As a result, these export-driven jobs pay wages averaging 25% higher than most other manufacturing jobs.4 On the other hand, the less-skilled manufacturing assembly jobs have been shifting from the higher-wage, developed economies in the United States and Western Europe to developing countries in Eastern Europe, China, Thailand, Mexico, and the Phillippines. Due to the increaseRead MoreSAT Top 30 Essay Evidence18536 Words   |à ‚  75 Pagesneed to take. Follow my model and you will have no trouble researching additional evidence on your own. I suggest studying at least three of the thirty examples I’ve provided, but if you’re really serious about getting a perfect 12, I recommend a minimum of five examples. When picking your evidence, go for variety. For example, pick one sports star, one adventurer, and one historical event. Studying a variety of evidence will give you more options to deal with unexpected prompts, and will makeRead MoreAccounting Information System Chapter 1137115 Words   |  549 Pageshas expired, students are motivated to do a good job, as they will be presenting to their peers. The value of this activity is not in arriving at a â€Å"right answer† as there are many right answers and student answers will vary. Instead, it is in thinking through the issues presented in Table 1-2 (business processes, key decisions, and information needs) and Figure 1-1 (interactions with external parties). Student answers should contain many of the things in Table 1-2 and Figure 1-1 as well asRead MoreStrategy Safari by Mintzberg71628 Words   |  287 Pagesfan! The Sixth no sooner had begun About the beast to grope, Than, seizing on the swinging tail That fell within his scope, I see, quoth he, the Elephant is very like a rope! And so these men of Indostan Disputed loud and long, Each of his own opinion Exceeding stiff and strong, Though each was partly in the right, And all were in the wrong! Moral So oft in theologic wars, The disputants, I ween, Rail on in utter ignorance Of what each other mean, And prate about an Elephant Not one of them hasRead MoreAdl 01 - Principles and Practices of Management Study Material.Pdf Uploaded Successfully30836 Words   |  124 Pagesmanagement. Principles and Practices of Management ADL 01 Schools of management thought The art of management has ancient roots. This part of discussion helps us to understand several view points and approaches that have shaped up managerial thinking during the past years†¦ Classical Schools of Management The classical management theory, developed during the Industrial Revolution when new problems related to the factory system began to appear. Managers were worried about increasing the efficiencyRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesand Meaning of the New York City Landscape Gerda Lerner, Fireweed: A Political Autobiography Allida M. Black, ed., Modern American Queer History Eric Sandweiss, St. Louis: The Evolution of an American Urban Landscape Sam Wineburg, Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past Sharon Hartman Strom, Political Woman: Florence Luscomb and the Legacy of Radical Reform Michael Adas, ed., Agricultural and Pastoral Societies in Ancient and Classical History Read MoreBackground Inditex, One of the Worlds Largest Fashion Distributors, Has Eight Major Sales Formats - Zara, Pull and Bear, Massimo Dutti, Bershka, Stradivarius, Oysho, Zara Home Y Kiddys Class- with 3.147 Stores in 70100262 Words   |  402 Pagestime I entered that heavy door into the institute on my first day of as a student in the IIIEE’s masters programme I knew that I had gained access to a very special place. The IIIEE is situated in a beautiful building, but what make this place truly magical for me is the people that I have met here. While they are too many to mention all by name I’d like to thank all the teachers, researchers and administrative staff who work, or has worked, here at the IIIEE for contributing to making this organisationRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pageswell as provides insightful examples from the practical world of organizations. The authors’ sound scholarship and transparent styl e of writing set the book apart, making it an ingenious read which invites reflexivity, criticalness and plurality of opinion from the audience. This is a book that will become a classic in organization studies. Mihaela L. Kelemen, Professor of Management Studies, Keele University, UK An unusually rich and deep philosophical book on organization theory with several new thinkersRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesmore concerned with his parents’ reaction than he is with finding a job? To some degree, this is a reflection of the job offer (too low a salary, too small a company, too limited a job description). However, it also suggests a generational shift in thinking. While the job market for new entrants is perhaps the most sluggish in memory, new college graduates remain committed to following their dreams and holding out high hopes for their careers. Scott’s father, David Nicholson, 57, has an established

Religious Similarities and Differences Free Essays

string(570) " small group of people to achieve redemption\? Another issue of exclusivity is that if one had to come across an individual who we as imperfect individuals would consider a saint but that person isn’t part of our religion, do we then say that such a person will go to hell because he wasn’t of Christian faith\? An advantage of this approach would ultimately be for one’s own satisfaction, due to the fact that by not worrying about all the other variety of possible religions being true and that an individual could just be content with one religion\." Introduction When looking at the various differences and similarities among the different religions, a question arises whether there is a possibility that all of them could be true. I follow one of the many religions that exist in our world and I always wonder how we are supposed to view all of the other traditions that exits? Western religions namely, Christianity and Judaism have something in common, which is the fact that they both believe in a supreme being who has personal attributes whereas Islam which is Middle Eastern believe in a supreme being who created the world in accordance with his Godly purpose.(Rowe 2007, 179) After analysing the differences among the many religions which exist today one arrives at a crucial question which is what has gone wrong with the human life and how can one fix it. We will write a custom essay sample on Religious Similarities and Differences or any similar topic only for you Order Now How does one approach and handle religious belief systems which conflict our own? John Hicks proposed a pluralistic hypothesis, now when taking that into account another questions arises which is whether all belief systems can exist and still be valid alongside one another. This essay attempts to explore a way one can deal with the conflicting truth-claims of different religions as well as examine John Hick’s hypothesis and whether his approach of pluralism would lead to polytheism. Differences among Religions Each faith is basically a reflection of the worldview of the area where it developed. The various religions cosmologies are different which is how they tend to explain the origins of the universe. What each religion emphasizes and their teachers are different such as Buddhism emphasizes letting go of suffering whereas in Christianity they emphasize social action. Judaism is a total life religion, every aspect of life is impacted for example the keeping of food utensils separate. Hinduism is very individualistic, and the expression of faith, practice and beliefs vary from one person to another. Each Religion has a different form of worship. Although Christianity, Judaism and Islamism share the belief in a Perfect being that exists these religions have different notions as to whether ultimate reality is the divine personal God or whether it’s an impersonal absolute as in Hinduism. Different conceptions exist concerning ones destiny and the overall cycle of life and death and whether rebirth does happen. The concept if Jesus differs among religions such as in the Islam faith Jesus is spoken of as a prophet and he himself wasn’t God but in Christianity God is our heavenly father and Jesus Christ. Revelation differs among religions, revelation is contained within the Torah for Judaists, The Bible for Christians, The Vedas for Hindus and The Quran for Muslims. The various religions have different beliefs regarding Sin. Christianity is more conventional in that it believes that all humans are surrounded by sin due to the actions Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Jesus Christ, representing God then died for the sins of Christians on the cross so that all Christians could achieve salvation. With regards to achieving salvation one needs to establish a relationship with God and worship him as well as remain obedient toward him, and then once one dies they are delivered from sin and receive eternal life. (Rowe 2007, 180) Salvation in terms of Hinduism doesn’t include following a personal God into another life after death has occurred but instead holds that salvation is obtained through the unity with the complete Brahman and freeing oneself from all singular entities in order to become one universal notion in Brahmans light. When looking at a religion, it can either be exclusivist in that it believes only in the beliefs it holds and that the system of belief of other religions are false or a religion can be inclusive in that we should all be accepting of the other belief systems. In terms of a pluralistic method towards religions as John Hicks proposed, all religions are valid and true. Exclusivity When referring to exclusivity when talking about religion, it represents the notion that an individual which follows a particular religion would only believe that which is supported by their religion and the ideas that encourage it. That individual would therefore believe that the truth is within their own religion and that what other religions support and believe cannot also be seen as true as it would then go against what they believe in. (Rowe 2007, 181) For example, me being a Christian believes that when I die I will go to heaven and reach redemption in living how God wanted me too then I cannot also believe that attaining redemption is being one with Brahman as the Hindu’s believe. An exclusivist religion rejects all other religions beliefs that aren’t shared with their own. Therefore what the Muslims might believe as true isn’t supported by other religions such as Judaism. Monotheism which is the belief in only one supreme God which created the heavens and the earth results in an exclusivist religion. Christianity is orthodox as to the fact that it has exclusivity, like the Roman Catholics believe that if an individual is not a member of the church then they will go to hell unless they join before they die. Roman Catholics ultimately believe that one cannot achieve salvation if they separate from the church. (Rowe 2007, 182) With exclusivity there come certain problems such as the fact that people need to be aware of and take into account that many people who have lived and died haven’t followed Christianity. A problem that comes with being an exclusivist is that they hold a narrow mind, which then leads to them have a bad relationship with those who believe in another God, this then causes a social disadvantage. They also need to bear in mind those individuals who lived before Christ and who have followed other dogma’s. Does one then have to conclude that God almighty only intended for a small group of people to achieve redemption? Another issue of exclusivity is that if one had to come across an individual who we as imperfect individuals would consider a saint but that person isn’t part of our religion, do we then say that such a person will go to hell because he wasn’t of Christian faith? An advantage of this approach would ultimately be for one’s own satisfaction, due to the fact that by not worrying about all the other variety of possible religions being true and that an individual could just be content with one religion. You read "Religious Similarities and Differences" in category "Papers" Any person who attempts to make a truth claim, due to the nature of truth, is an exclusivist. Inclusivity As mentioned above, Judaism and Christianity are both exclusive religions, however Islam is not exclusivist but more inclusive as they accept all prophets starting from Adam right up until Muhammad and believe that the Bibles original scriptures being the Torah in its unaltered form is still correct. Inclusivity maintains that everyone should be accepting of other religions and what they stand for. With regards to the problems raised by exclusivity as mentioned above, inclusivity addresses them. In terms of Inclusivity, an exclusivist religion will adjust in order to cope with problems as abovementioned. The Roman Catholics for example, have readjusted their belief that people who don’t belong to the church will not achieve salvation. (Rowe 2007, 183) The readdressed it as then stated that individuals who were unaware of Christianity and its beliefs and the church but live in terms of and search for the supreme God are able to achieve salvation. In terms of the Islam belief, Allah may forgive whoever including those who have no access to the message of God or follow a different religion but still live a virtuous life. Therefore in terms of inclusivity, one may achieve and get salvation even though you are unaware of Christ or Christianity, as a person who follows only one religion, inclusivism allows us to accept those who have no control over the fact that they have had no opportunity to be educated and made aware of Christianity an allows such individuals to also achieve redemption. One cannot discredit other religions believes because we don’t believe in them due to being born somewhere else in a different are and time. Those who follow a different religion should be allowed to achieve redemption by the way in which they believe they will because that is what they know and have been raised to follow just as we were raised to follow Christianity. We should respect their religions just like they should be respectful of ours. However, inclusivity becomes impossible, which is a consequences of the nature of truth claim. This is that whenever one makes a claim, that person is claiming that it is true which ultimately implies that all that which contradicts it is false. One can try to be one hundred percent inclusive but they will never be fully inclusive as it will exclude any person who holds and believes a view contrary to one’s own.   John Hicks Pluralism The hypothesis on Pluralism held by John Hick states that an ultimate reality that all religious systems provide means to achieve doesn’t exist due to the fact that no religion holds direct knowledge of what is meant to be the â€Å"real†. Religions should be seen differently in a way that one can view what is considered the â€Å"real†.(Johnson 1997) When bearing in mind all the religions that exist in the world and everything that each religion holds one starts to doubt each of them. One begins to take a sceptical approach towards religion. When doing so one can view the various religious traditions as illusions which each being created for themselves in their minds. In order to take a more narrow approach, one will then need to regard all religions, except one’s own as an illusion. Due to this it makes more sense to believe that one regards their own religion as the truth or more true than others because it is their own religion in which they have placed all their faith it. (Rowe 2007, 184) One of the reasons why all the different religions have truths that are conflicting with regards to what’s considered the ultimate real is due to the fact that each of them have no direct contact or access to the ultimate reality because it is merely perceived through their religious traditions. (Johnson 1997) Us as individuals and followers of our religions cannot therefore say that our religion of choice is above anyone else’s because we all regard our own religion as what’s the truth before our own God. An individually naturally will favour one’s own perspective and belief as it is the one you chose and put all your faith into. (Heim 1990, 67) The Pluralistic approach held by John Hick is to view each religion equally as each system holds a promise of salvation and promises saving from all wrong in life. The Pluralistic approach is one in which each individual regards all other religious systems as equally valid as one’s own. What each individual believes about their God tend to be mere perceptions of Him. (Hick 1922, 93). In Pluralisms aim to be as inclusive as possible by accepting every religion and their beliefs as long as it benefits their followers it ultimately becomes what it is trying to avoid which is exclusive. Pluralisms exclusivity and inclusivity relies upon what an individual does or doesn’t do whereas in Christianity for example, it relies upon what Christ has done for you as a follower. The inclusiveness of Pluralism originates from the idea that all individuals can be good enough but its exclusivity then originates from the reality of the fact that not every individual will be good enough, pluralism ultimately doesn’t even provide a standard in order for us to measure what good enough entails so how can one even begin to understand it. Religious diversity and Polytheism Polytheism is the belief in or the worship of more than one God, it holds that every divine being present in each different religion are all divine beings and that the belief systems of these religions are considered and seen as true. Polytheism however comes with a problem, it can be rendered void. The reason why it can be rendered void is because within each religion, their divine being that they believe in is regarded, to them, as the only divine being. Therefore, it raises the issue that if that’s the case then they cannot exist alongside each other and be considered as valid. (Rowe 2007, 185) Pluralism established in order to develop a more satisfying and acceptable explanation to one’s belief and perception of what the ultimate reality really is. Due to this establishment of pluralism, one can now say that an individual can undergo some form of transformation and still obtain salvation in any one of the existing religious systems in our world. (Rowe 2007, 187) One tends to doubt this idea of pluralism as to the fact that it is difficult to accept something that one cannot describe and that holds no fundamental properties. Polytheism allows individuals to say and believe that in reality there exists only one God who holds different names according to the different religions. Conclusion If one had to follow an inclusivist approach then you would believe and accept that all religious systems that exist can be accepted as true due to one’s own personal experience whereas in contrast, a strict exclusivist approach holds that only one God exists and all other Gods that exist due to various different religions are false. The Pluralistic approach in terms of John Hick then goes further to conclude that there exists only one God who holds various names which relates to different religions. How can we as individuals know which is correct as all of the above mentioned approaches cannot be correct and true at the same time. It is then crucial to understand that any belief that is claimed to be true should also then be subjected and open to contradiction. The Muslim religion believe that the one and only true God is Allah whereas the Hindu religion believe that there exists more than one God so therefore, it is clear that both these truth-claims claimed by these various religions contradict one another and therefore they both cannot be true at the same time. This also acts as evidential proof the John Hicks pluralism hypothesis also cannot be valid as he ultimately assumes exactly what he’s trying to prove. It is therefore then rational to conclude that our ideas of God are merely a creation which we invented in our imagination in order to make sense of the world and why things happen the way they do as well as to create a form of a â€Å"security blanket† for ourselves to rely on and put all our belief into. The fact that so many religious systems exist in our world shouldn’t be discredited but should be seen as different responses to one ultimate reality. When looking at the different beliefs individuals follow it is crucial to take into consideration ones accidental circumstances that one is born into or lives in. The hypothesis created by John Hick ultimately leads to polytheism as to the fact that all religious systems are able to function alongside one another and still be considered valid and acceptable regardless of the conflicting beliefs they each face. (Hick 1990, 119) One needs to accept all religious systems as valid as each one makes a positive impact on their followers lives, one needs to understand that just as we put our faith into one belief, so do many others even though it might not be the same belief as yours. Just because another individual doesn’t follow the belief you yourself does, it doesn’t make their religion or beliefs false. Just like others accept you and your belief so should you be accepting of theirs as it all comes down to respect. What I believe as true as a Christian doesn’t leave what Muslims believe to be false, and out of respect one needs to accept that not everyone will believe in the same religion and that’s okay, as long as everyone is shown the same respect regarding their beliefs. How to cite Religious Similarities and Differences, Papers